What do you and I do?
Richard Russell BIG snippet
Dow Theory Letters
Feb 24, 2011
February 22, 2011 -- Over the weekend I gave the following
a lot of thought. Does any of the following make me a bad person?
I never cared at all as to which teams would be in the Super
Bowl or which team would win.
I didn't like the Grammys and I didn't wait to see who won in
I couldn't care less who will win the Academy Awards. I'm tired
of watching the entertainment business congratulate itself.
I don't really care whether Microsoft ever comes up with anything
I don't care if Sarah Palin becomes the GOP's presidential candidate
or if she doesn't.
I don't really give a damn whether Michael Vick ever speaks the
truth about his true sentiment toward dogs. I just think Michael
Vick is a dog, a dirty dog.
I don't care whether Ben Bernanke (he's the Fed Chairman) ever
confesses that he doesn't know what he's doing with quantitative
Those are some of the items I thought about over the three-day
weekend. And just in case you're interested, I decided that I'm
not a bad person. Below are a few more of my weekend thoughts.
I like the Constitution of the United States.
I am suspicious of all fiat currency.
I think the US should print its own money. [????]
I'm all for the gold standard.
I like gold and silver.
I like dogs, and I like aquarium fish, both fresh-water and salt-water.
I loved my mother, and I was good to her (at least, I think I
I'm an optimist regarding the future of the world (although I
think we're going to see tough times before we see good times
I believe (assume) that there is a great and divine power, but
I don't like organized religions. I believe organized religions
throughout history have done more harm than good.
I believe that all men (well, MOST men) have larceny in their
I'm all for Arab revolutions. But the big kahuna, the really
evil one, is stone-age Saudi Arabia, the ultimate cruel dictatorship.
I believe a hungry man is an angry man.
I think that in due time the world will go vegan. I can't believe
(it's true) that we slaughter 125,000 cattle each and every day.
If it's considered uncouth to wear furs, why is it OK to eat
hamburgers by the hundreds of millions each and every day?
Germany was nearly destroyed by inflation. To this day Germans
fear inflation. America was nearly destroyed by deflation. To
this day, Americans fear deflation.
President Obama is obsessed with being re-elected. So far, he's
done nothing to reduce the US deficit. Will Obama sell the nation
"down the river" to get re-elected? Obama has turned
the whole problem over to the GOP, which is cute. Will anything
at all get done about the deficits? We'll know before 2012 election
Long ago, I came up with two expressions that fit every occasion
in life --
(1) Nothing's easy.
(2) Nothing works.
And I've also come up with the two most difficult tasks in life
(1) To get the correct information about any particular matter.
(2) To get anyone to do what they say they are going to do.
OK, enough Russell nonsense. Referring to number 2 above, I said
I was going to write a site on Tuesday, and now I'm going to
Retire, get-away, escape, stay-cation, vacation, time out, sabbatical,
down-time, hiatus, lay-back. There are dozens of words in the
English language to describe the act of ending one's life work
and relaxing and doing nothing during the precious years that
But those words may be ancient history for future US generations.
According to an article in last weekend's WSJ:
"The median household, headed by a person 60 to 62 with
a 401(k) account has less than one quarter of what is needed
in the account to maintain one's standard of living in retirement,
according to data compiled by the Federal Reserve and analyzed
by the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College for the
Wall Street Journal. Even counting Social Security and any pensions
or other savings, most participants appear to have insufficient
savings. Data from other sources also show big gaps between savings
and what people need, and the current financial crisis has made
"Facing shortfalls, many people are postponing retirement,
moving to cheaper housing, buying less-expensive food, cutting
back on travel, taking bigger risks with their investments, and
making other sacrifices that they never imagined."
The tax-deferred 401(k) accounts came into wide use in the 1980s.
About 60% of households nearing retirement age have 401(k) accounts,
according to government data, and these accounts represent the
majority of most people's savings.
Vanguard Group, one of the biggest providers of 401(k) plans,
has been advising people to place 9 to 12 percent of their income
into retirement plans. Vanguard now advises that people place
12-15 percent of their income into retirement plans.
With the cost of food, energy, taxes, college, medicine and almost
everything else rising, owners of 401(k) plans are having a difficult
time putting even 9% of their income into their plans.
What does this mean, as we enter the time when the first generation
of baby boomers reaches the retirement age of 65? It means that
people will have to continue to work into their 70s and beyond.
It also means that mass retirement will become an American memory.
The two areas that our government leaders have refused to attack
(i.e. cut back on) are the military and entitlements. The military
plus entitlements gobble up 80% of all government spending. If
the US is to get anywhere at all with solving its monster deficit
problem ($1.6 trillion for the current fiscal year), it will
have to whittle back on both the military and our entitlements.
If Social Security is pared down (and ultimately it will have
to be attacked), retirement in America will be reserved for the
This is going to cause trouble. Americans will have to face the
fact that the standard of living in the US is in a downtrend.
To face stark reality, it doesn't make sense that the majority
in China and India live just a step away from poverty while people
in developed countries are continuing to live "the good
life." This will change, and while the standard of living
in the US and Europe will decline, the standard of living in
Asia will improve.
All of which presents a problem for me and my subscribers. Is
there any way that we can beat the dismal odds? The good old
American way is as follows: We can make a fortune in the rising
stock market or the precious metals market, fortunes that will
tide us over during the coming difficult pay-back years. The
other way is that we be invested so successfully that our investments
will keep us "in good shape" during the coming deleveraging
But there's a problem. Stocks today are not priced to generate
profits over the years ahead. Sure, under the auspices of the
money-printing Fed, the stock market might continue to rise.
But that's a risky bet on the Fed. For many investors it's the
only course that makes sense.
There are roughly $2 trillion currently buried in the coffers
of US corporations. Because of the many uncertainties that lie
ahead, corporations are hoarding their cash. Corporate CEOs don't
know what President Obama is planning next in his strategy of
making the government "master of everything" while
planing to distribute money from the "fat rich to the deserving
poor" via taxation.
I've said before that the period of "making money"
has essentially come to an end. The new era of "not losing
money" or not losing purchasing power has arrived. Another
way of putting it is that the era of protecting what we still
have has arrived. Inflation, cost of living and rising taxes
will all take their turns in eating into the good life that Americans
have enjoyed since the end of World War II.
The years since World War II have been characterized by leveraging,
borrowing, money creation and debt. Plus the US's great advantage
of having a monopoly on the world's reserve currency. Since WW
II, the US could print all the money it needed, and the world
would accept that money.
I've always said that the dollar was the Achilles Heel of the
US economy. Now, nations with low-salaried workers are competing
with the high-cost workers of the US. The US insists that it
wants a "strong dollar." But a weak dollar better serves
the US's interests. A weak dollar helps US exports, and it eases
the near-impossible task of servicing the monster debts of the
For decades, the rising price of gold has, in effect, devalued
the US dollar. Those who hold large quantities of both real and
paper gold have kept up with, or even improved, their relative
standard of living. Gold is now held by a tiny minority of Americans.
More recently, Americans have poured their money into an area
that they "understand" and feel comfortable with. That
area is the supposed safe-haven area of blue-chip US stocks.
Will the rising stock market serve to preserve the great American
dream? The dividend yield on the S&P 500 Composite is now
a "micro" 1.80%. This is as low as anything I can remember.
Since World War II, better than half the increase in the S&P
Composite has been a function of reinvestment of dividends. But
buying stocks today for their dividend yield is a fool's game.
The only reason to buy stocks today is that you believe top-quality
stocks (i.e. the Dow) will continue to rise and thereby serve
as a safe-haven against the predations of the Fed and the US
From Ben Bernanke's standpoint, he's seen money-printing and
low interest rates send tech stocks through the roof, he's seen
money-printing and low interest rates send housing prices to
the sky. And now Bernanke is watching and hoping as money-printing
and near-zero interest rates send the stock market heavenward.
If stocks continue to rocket higher, thinks Ben Bernanke, won't
that spill over to housing and consumer confidence? "It
has to," concludes Bernanke, who is opening the flood-gates
via Qe2 and probably thinking about Qe3 if it's necessary.
In the meantime, the Bernanke-Obama team continues to worry about
nonexistent deflation. The main deflation today is in the living
standard of the majority of Americans.
And what do you and I do? The best I can come up with is that
we sit with our holdings of gold and silver.
email: Dow Theory Letters
© Copyright 1958-2013 Dow Theory Letters, Inc.
began publishing Dow Theory Letters in 1958, and he has
been writing the Letters ever since (never once having skipped
a Letter). Dow Theory Letters is the oldest service continuously
written by one person in the business.
offers a TRIAL (two consecutive up-to-date issues) for $1.00 (same price that was
originally charged in 1958). Trials, please one time only. Mail
your $1.00 check to: Dow Theory Letters, PO Box 1759, La Jolla,
CA 92038 (annual cost of a subscription is $300, tax deductible
if ordered through your business).