Gold Forecaster
- Global Watch
F.O.M.C. - The prospects
for the U.S. interest rates and the $
Julian D.W.
Phillips
Gold Forecaster snippet
May 14, 2007
- Below is a snippet from the
latest weekly issue from www.GoldForecaster.com
The Fed's Open Market Committee
yesterday repeated its assessment from March 21st that persistent
inflation remains the predominant policy concern. Interest rates
were held at 5.25%. The Fed has just said, "inflation is
a predominant risk" but did not raise interest rates, and
indicated that it is not likely to do so, as it pointed to lower
growth and the ongoing housing price problems.
The impression given is that it will react to higher inflation
but will not pre-empt it. The dangers of inflation with falling
growth [stagflation] are now apparent. This is gold positive
and $ negative as the Trade deficit will continue at excessive
levels in a climate that could discourage the investment of surplus
$ [Asian nations in particular] back into the States.
Caught between lower growth and inflation, the Fed is caught
between a rock and a hard place and unlikely to move rates until
one overrides the other completely. We have said over a very
long period that the Fed must guard against falling growth even
if inflation takes off. Growth is extremely difficult to engender,
whereas inflation is manageable, without damaging jobs.
The FOMC reiterated that "the
committee's predominant policy concern remains the risk that
inflation will fail to moderate as expected.'' However, the economy
is still likely to grow at a moderate pace in coming quarters.
We at the Gold Forecaster would suggest that a
very firm eye be kept on growth figures for if it seems that
growth will slide, be sure that inflation fighting will retreat
to sitting in the trenches and stimulation will lead the charge.
We believe it would be a mistake to think that the Fed will raise
rates to attack inflation, if there is the slightest risk that
growth will be damaged.
The U.S. economy expanded at
a 1.3% annual rate last quarter, handicapped by a 17% slide in
residential investment, the sixth quarterly decline. At the same
time, unemployment was 4.5% last month, close to a five-year
low. With falling growth all eyes are on the way forward. Is
it to stagflation, or inflation, on the back of sound growth?
The answer to this will dictate the way forward for the $. Consequently,
Investors have postponed their expectations for a rate cut to
the final three months of the year, from the third quarter immediately
following the March meeting. Two-year note yields rose 6 basis
points yesterday, to 4.73%.
The Trade deficit.
Rising to $63.9 billion
the Trade deficit continues at $ undermining levels and should
continue to do so for the foreseeable future. As Paulson advocates
a strong $ at market rates [a contradiction in terms?] the $
showed initial strength rising above the danger zone between
$1.35 - $1.37. Media attention concentrated on it rising above
last month's level and not on the amazing accumulation of the
deficit over the year, on top of previous years.
To emphasize what we are saying,
imagine it were twice the present level, a level to cause global
$ indigestion, what would be the consequences? Clearly, a tumbling
$. So the reality is that the deficit will continue at these
levels in the future, so for it to go on for twice as long, would
result in the same damage to the $. In other words, at some point
in the future the deficit just will not be accepted and the $
will crash.
Imagine now a bank's customer
loaned persistently from the bank with no hope of repaying the
debt, what would happen? Now imagine this customer is the only
client of that bank or several banks, what would happen? Quite
frankly it is in the interests of all parties to ensure that
the myth of a steady $ exchange rate [held there by intervention
by surplus holders] will be blown away someday.
Until then so long as it can
be translated into goods at present values it serves surplus
holders to keep its value up and does not serve the U.S. government,
as jobs and capital ownership shifts eastwards. Perhaps the sapping
of the U.S.' global economic strength is deemed unavoidable and
the authorities are making sure that the weakening is done without
pain, as no other solution is available?
Validating our belief that
a growing U.S. economy sucks in imports, during March, imports
and exports rebounded to their second-highest levels on record,
but imports rose faster than exports. Imports of goods alone
rose 5.1% to $160.3 billion in March. In addition to oil, the
U.S. imported more autos, consumer goods, and food. Exports of
goods alone rose 2.0% to $90.2 billion. U.S. exports of industrial
supplies, autos and consumer goods rose in March. Of course the
higher oil price had a significant impact on the Balance of Payments,
as the petroleum deficit widened 2.6% to $45.5 billion, the largest
deficit since last September. The U.S. imported 324.2 million
barrels of crude oil in March, or 10.5 million barrels per day,
marking the highest level since last August. These figures compared
with 252.9 million barrels, or 9.0 million barrels, respectively,
in February. The average price per barrel of oil rose to $53
in March, its highest level since December. With the oil price
rising through, to over, $60 a barrel, expect next month's Trade
deficit to widen accordingly.
So the prognosis on the Trade
front is not good and the $ should reflect this. We believe intervention
is currently preventing this, but against strong flows of 'carry
trade' investments and the investment of surplus $' back into
the States.
This leave the question begging,
"Just how long will the U.S. or anyone else, allow this?"
Please subscribe to www.GoldForecaster.com
for the entire report.
May 11, 2007
-Julian
D.W. Phillips
email: gold-authenticmoney@iafrica.com
321gold Ltd
|
