 INSTITUTIONAL ADVISORS DECEMBER 20,
2007
Tax Rip-Offs and a Remedy
for Reckless Central Banking
Bob Hoye
Institutional Advisors
posted Dec 27, 2007
One would have hoped that financial
rip-offs committed by medieval princes would have been permanently
shelved when liberal enlightenment ended the divine right of
kings.
Recent imperious announcements
by Messrs. Greenspan and Bernanke to use the "printing press"
to inflate anything they can should be considered startling only
in the resort to honesty. Euphemisms for currency depreciations
started with the original promoters of the Fed and the tout was
that a "flexible" currency would prevent serious financial
contractions.
Regrettably, since the doors
of the Fed were opened in 1914 there have been many financial
crises and the dollar has lost 95% of its purchasing power. Particularly
ironical is that since originally touted as an agent of stability,
financial volatility has increased and has continued to the remarkable
violence in the sub-prime sector, for example. This is a subset
of the lengthy experiment in artificial "investments"
otherwise known as derivatives.
On the very big picture, long-dated
rates in the senior currency have ranged from the low of 1.85%
in 1941 to the high of 15% in 1981. During the 200 years prior
to the chronic attempt to artificially lower interest rates,
the range was 2.25% to 6.00%.
Obviously, imposition of ambitious
policymaking has introduced extraordinary volatility, and in
a separate article we have pointed out that while the commodity
and financial markets have suffered many severe contractions,
the concept and practices of central banking have never been
corrected.
Nineteenth Century liberals,
so rational and principled in their views, could not have imagined
the greedy craft developed by many modern governments in confiscating
private wealth earned by productively working citizens. Are we
seeing medieval financial tyranny replicated by today's proponents
of the divine right of bureaucrats? A look at history provides
perspective, and, although outrageous when imposed, the passage
of time makes early examples of princely finance somewhat amusing:
The colourful Richard I (1189-1199)
sold property to finance his joining the crusade of Peter the
Hermit. Upon returning, he took it back on the pretense that
originally he had no right to sell it.
The infamous King John (prompted
the Magna Carta in 1215) introduced the clever plan of imprisoning
and ransoming the mistresses of priests, confident that the funds
he could not obtain from their greed he would from their lust.
Edward I (1272-1307) confiscated
money and silver or gold plate from monasteries and churches,
faked a voyage to the Holy Land and, in keeping the money, refused
to go.
Edward IV (1461-1483) was described
as the handsomest tax-gatherer in the country; and when he kissed
a widow because she gave him more than he expected, it is said
she doubled the amount in hopes of another kiss.
Henry VII (1485-1509) was fiscally
sound and approached wealthy families with two arguments. If
the household was not extravagant in expenditure, then he attacked
what they had saved by thrift; while if they lived extravagantly
they were considered opulent and could afford any exaction. Named
after his minister of finance, the ploy was called "Morton's
Fork".
A broader form of wealth confiscation
capable of tapping even the poor was accomplished by currency
debasement and extreme examples in ripping off everyone provoked
severe social disorder. No matter what method employed, financial
outrage prompted the evolution of parliament as a necessary means
of constraining fiscal ambitions of the governing classes.
The struggle between individual
freedom and authoritarian state proceeded until the late 1600s
when growing commercial wealth and political power in London
began to become influential with its financial common sense.
The specific event that formalized the victory over the ancient
status quo was the "Glorious Revolution" of 1688, which
maneuvered the pro-business and Protestant William of Orange
into the British Crown and displaced James II as the last absolutist
king. How refreshing this was is indicated by the oppressive
politics of his and his predecessor, Charles II. Starting with
the restoration of the monarchy with Charles in 1660, both kings
were bribed by France to change the culture of England - consistently
in an authoritarian direction. Scornful remarks by miffed establishment
were similar to those directed to the pro-business movement today.
No matter how imaginative or
despotic princely financing was, it can't compare with the long-
running compulsion to spend other people's money by today's bureaucrats
and politicians, virtually unrestrained by the checks and balances
of constitution or mainstream media.
But before expanding this point,
consideration should be given to the other event that formally
ended the old world, which was the beginning of modern finance
with the incorporation of the Bank of England in 1694. As history
shows, central banking is fine when disciplined by a convertible
currency and, when not, it becomes a tool of state ambition to
confiscate wealth though currency depreciation. That the dollar
has lost 95% of its value exceeds most princely devaluations
and, like those, has been no accident.
Indeed, recent Fed announcements
to "print money" could be an attempt to go for the
final 5%. While many outside central banking would consider this
as infinite folly, it is uncertain as to how long this endeavour
will maintain credulity in even academic circles. Regrettably,
modern financial agencies such as the Treasury or Federal Reserve
System have become as corruptible as their medieval counterparts.
Fortunately, history provides
some antidotes to governmental abuse of the productive sector.
Short of rebellion, the most effective of course has been to
force government and its financial agencies to be accountable
to the taxpayer. As for those who have wrecked the currency (also
a government responsibility), Dante, in his Inferno, reserves
a special place in hell for "false moneyers".
The Anglo-Saxon Chronicles
record something equivalent, albeit more temporal:
"1125 A.D. In this year
before Christmas King Henry sent from Normandy to England and
gave instructions that all moneyers ... be deprived of their
members ... Bishop Roger of Salisbury commanded them all to assemble
at Winchester by Christmas. When they came hither they were then
taken one by one, and each deprived of the right hand and the
testicles below. All this was done in twelve days between Christmas
and Epiphany, and was entirely justified because they had ruined
the whole country by the magnitude of their fraud which they
paid for in full."
-The Laud Chronicle (E)
Fortunately, history indicates
that the public will eventually figure out that no matter how
beguiling the claims about currency management and taxation are,
the gambit has been mainly to confiscate private savings. They
will then demand the return of sound money and accountable government.
###
-Bob Hoye
Institutional Advisors
email: bobhoye@institutionaladvisors.com
website: www.institutionaladvisors.com
Hoye Archives
The opinions
in this report are solely those of the author. The information
herein was obtained from various sources; however we do not guarantee
its accuracy or completeness. This research report is prepared
for general circulation and is circulated for general information
only. It does not have regard to the specific investment objectives,
financial situation and the particular needs of any specific person
who may receive this report. Investors should seek financial advice
regarding the appropriateness of investing in any securities or
investment strategies discussed or recommended in this report
and should understand that statements regarding future prospects
may not be realized.
Investors should note that income from such
securities, if any, may fluctuate and that each security's price
or value may rise or fall. Accordingly, investors may receive
back less than originally invested. Past performance is not necessarily
a guide to future performance. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed constitutes
an offer to buy or sell any securities or options or futures contracts.
Foreign currency rates of exchange may adversely affect the value,
price or income of any security or related investment mentioned
in this report. In addition, investors in securities such as ADRs,
whose values are influenced by the currency of the underlying
security, effectively assume currency risk. Moreover, from time to time, members of the Institutional Advisors team may be long or short positions discussed in our publications.
321gold Ltd
|
